Institutional quantitative risk analytics infrastructure for digital asset markets.
- Grayscale Ethereum Mini TrustDigital Asset ETP2026-0957 ↑ 67Score moved from 57 to 67.
- iShares Bitcoin TrustDigital Asset ETP2026-0966 ↑ 72Score moved from 66 to 72.
- iShares Bitcoin TrustDigital Asset ETP2026-0972 ↑ 83Score moved from 72 to 83.
- Fidelity Ethereum FundDigital Asset ETP2026-0945 ↑ 79Score moved from 45 to 79.
- Backed FinanceTokenised RWA2026-0864 ↓ 52Score moved from 64 to 52.
- BitFuFuInfrastructure2026-0850 ↓ 48Score moved from 50 to 48.
- Compass MiningInfrastructure2026-0854 ↓ 47Score moved from 54 to 47.
- Core ScientificInfrastructure2026-0848 ↓ 46Score moved from 48 to 46.
How ACI interprets risk.
Explore how ACI interprets risk across providers, modules, and methodology. Each ACI Risk Indicator is derived from structured evidence — not opinion, not inference.
What drives the MakerDAO ACI Risk Indicator?
The ACI Risk Indicator for MakerDAO reflects collateralisation ratios, DAI peg stability, liquidation threshold margins, and governance concentration metrics — each derived from on-chain data and publicly available protocol documentation. No single factor determines the output; the ACI Framework v1.0 applies a deterministic weighted computation across all criteria.
ACI's outputs are deterministic, its methodology is versioned and public, its evidence is dated and sourced, and every published ACI Risk Indicator carries the framework version and approval record that produced it. That combination is what makes it a defensible input into investment decision-making.
ACI computes risk. You decide how to allocate capital.
Request institutional access →